I think everyone agrees that this fellow (Obama) is a gifted campaigner. We can argue with the substance of his plan or the lack of one, but his delivery is world-class. The notion that he doesn't go into much detail about how things will happen, isn't really the point. In politics, it's easy to have your plans picked apart and shredded - so ambiguity about the detail is not a bad thing for Obama and he clearly knows that. People groove on the fact that he might actually understand the problem - a logical prerequisite to creating a solution. It will also be important to here something other than a framing of the issue. He couldn't go all-the-way without it, could he?
He is so good at describing what hurts that nobody cares if he knows how to fix it. The truth is that solutions are complicated. Too
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi8nL5sPhP2ydzzuJy_lqcNARlHDV_rgVTMVaX4uWG0AF00AJUCEgEh1_QsY7AfwgHhr6HOukvhg8xTgW1MMJFcjaBP1b801PZtJKwpMtVwoXVjV09Ni3hHWVRg73Tg0C8dyB6Jvl-kYCE/s200/wobama.jpg)
So maybe he's not capable of being a good President. Maybe he's mostly full of shit like everyone else. The chances are pretty good that he is. I mean he seems to be quite the bullslinger. That feature doesn't help close the deal for me. It kind of rubs me the wrong way - you know what I mean. Maybe he has the world's greatest writers in his camp and all he is is a good actor. Maybe? And... while "the speech" didn't give solutions, it did do an outstanding job as a response to the "Your pastor is a nut" problem. It was delivered well and it was an awesome piece of writing on an important subject. It may rank up there as one of the best in history.
I think it's possible (likely) that the skills of a great campaigner and those of a great President, may not be the same. Then how do we choose?
No comments:
Post a Comment